On May 17, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit found that the Administration’s rescission of DACA violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). The Court of Appeals agreed with the district court that the plaintiffs’ challenges are subject to judicial review and that the government’s decision to rescind DACA did not require notice and comment under the APA. But, the Court of Appeals held that the government’s decision to do so violated the APA because it was not adequately explained and thus was arbitrary and capricious. The Fourth Circuit also held that the district court erred in ordering the government to comply with its policies promulgated in 2012 on the use of information provided by DACA applicants and enjoined it from altering those policies. (Casa de Maryland v. DHS)
USCIS began using the 2025 Naturalization Civics Test for all applications filed on or after…
The government shutdown that recently ended was the longest in U.S. history. During that time,…
The Trump administration drastically changed its interpretation of immigration law as it relates to the…
Asylum Cooperative Agreements On October 31, 2025, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued Matter…
On December 2, 2025, the Trump administration placed an indefinite hold on all asylum applications…
On December 16, 2025, President Trump significantly expanded the U.S. travel ban, adding many new…