On May 17, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit found that the Administration’s rescission of DACA violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). The Court of Appeals agreed with the district court that the plaintiffs’ challenges are subject to judicial review and that the government’s decision to rescind DACA did not require notice and comment under the APA. But, the Court of Appeals held that the government’s decision to do so violated the APA because it was not adequately explained and thus was arbitrary and capricious. The Fourth Circuit also held that the district court erred in ordering the government to comply with its policies promulgated in 2012 on the use of information provided by DACA applicants and enjoined it from altering those policies. (Casa de Maryland v. DHS)
On March 22, 2024, DHS extended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Burma for 18 months,…
On February 14, 2024, President Biden issued an executive order authorizing Deferred Enforced Departure (DED)…
USCIS is [updated] its government filing fees on April 1, 2024, in large part increasing…
A recent U.S. Department of Health and Human Services report reveals that refugees and asylees…
USCIS filing fees for most petitions and applications are increasing effective April 1, 2024. In…
Recently, DHS announced a Family Reunification Parole Process for Ecuador. This parole process applies to…