Supreme Court Holds Gender-Based Distinction for Acquisition of Citizenship Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court found unconstitutional the gender-based distinction in the immigration act, requiring a shorter period of parental physical presence in the U.S. for acquisition of citizenship through an unwed citizen mother versus an unwed citizen father. Rather than extending the shorter period of required physical presence to children of unwed citizen fathers, or the longer period to unwed citizen mothers, the Justices said that it was up to Congress, rather than the Court, to act on the issue.

Published by
Palmer Polaski PC

Recent Posts

USCIS Flexibility Regarding Late-Filed Employment-Based Petitions

The government shutdown that recently ended was the longest in U.S. history. During that time,…

2 days ago

State of Habeas Litigation

The Trump administration drastically changed its interpretation of immigration law as it relates to the…

1 week ago

BIA Ruling Alters Handling of Asylum Cases

Asylum Cooperative Agreements On October 31, 2025, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued Matter…

2 weeks ago

Understanding the Asylum and Benefits “Pause”

On December 2, 2025, the Trump administration placed an indefinite hold on all asylum applications…

3 weeks ago

Presidential Proclamation Expands Travel Ban

On December 16, 2025, President Trump significantly expanded the U.S. travel ban, adding many new…

4 weeks ago

New DHS Rule Ends Automatic EAD Extensions

Effective October 30, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security announced an interim final rule ending…

1 month ago