Supreme Court Holds Gender-Based Distinction for Acquisition of Citizenship Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court found unconstitutional the gender-based distinction in the immigration act, requiring a shorter period of parental physical presence in the U.S. for acquisition of citizenship through an unwed citizen mother versus an unwed citizen father. Rather than extending the shorter period of required physical presence to children of unwed citizen fathers, or the longer period to unwed citizen mothers, the Justices said that it was up to Congress, rather than the Court, to act on the issue.

Published by
Palmer Polaski PC

Recent Posts

Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) for Palestinians

On February 14, 2024, President Biden issued an executive order authorizing Deferred Enforced Departure (DED)…

2 weeks ago

USCIS Fee Hike: Lawsuit A Potential Block to Asylum Program Rule

USCIS is [updated] its government filing fees on April 1, 2024, in large part increasing…

3 weeks ago

Refugees and asylees have significantly contributed to the U.S. economy

A recent U.S. Department of Health and Human Services report reveals that refugees and asylees…

4 weeks ago

USCIS Filing Fees Increase Effective April 1

USCIS filing fees for most petitions and applications are increasing effective April 1, 2024. In…

1 month ago

Family Reunification for Ecuadorians

Recently,  DHS announced a Family Reunification Parole Process for Ecuador. This parole process applies to…

1 month ago

Alien Smuggling: A Pitfall on the Pathway to Lawful Permanent Residence

Alien smuggling is a ground of inadmissibility that is often overlooked when applying for admission,…

2 months ago