Palmer Polaski Immigration Alerts

The Biden Administration Introduces Abhorrent Asylum Restrictions

In late February, the Biden Administration announced new asylum policies that seek to disqualify migrants from asylee status if they entered the United States between official ports of entry after failing to seek refugee status in other countries that they may have crossed along the way. This proposed policy change can be detrimental to many asylum seekers from the southern border who have no other choice but to cross a third country to enter the United States.

The proposed policy is inconsistent with asylum law, which only prohibits eligibility if the applicant “firmly resettled” in a third country. While firm resettlement may require a complex legal analysis, typically it requires that the individual receive legal status in a third country that allows them to remain indefinitely and safely. The new policy, however, creates a “rebuttable presumption of asylum ineligibility” for those arriving at the southern border who have not pursued “protection in a country through which they traveled,” unless “they meet exceptions that will be specified.” Many critics of the policy see comparisons to actions taken by the Trump Administration to deter asylum seekers from receiving their due process under the law.

The Biden Administration’s far-reaching transit rule aims to disqualify individuals who crossed a third country on their way to the United States on the assumption that they could have safely resettled in a third country. In essence, the administration’s third-country transit rule assumes that just because an applicant passes through a third country, they can safely resettle there. This is simply not true. Many of the countries that these individuals are crossing cannot offer them the safety that they would receive in the United States.

Rather than creating unlawful changes to asylum eligibility, a more reasoned approach would be to improve procedures in courts and asylum offices to make sure claims can be processes more efficiently but still fairly.

Published by
Palmer Polaski PC

Recent Posts

Recent Immigration Rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court

Disappointingly, the U.S. Supreme Court held 6-3 that Texas’s SB4 could go into effect. The…

1 day ago

TPS for Burma Extended and Redesignated

On March 22, 2024, DHS extended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Burma for 18 months,…

1 week ago

Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) for Palestinians

On February 14, 2024, President Biden issued an executive order authorizing Deferred Enforced Departure (DED)…

3 weeks ago

USCIS Fee Hike: Lawsuit A Potential Block to Asylum Program Rule

USCIS is [updated] its government filing fees on April 1, 2024, in large part increasing…

4 weeks ago

Refugees and asylees have significantly contributed to the U.S. economy

A recent U.S. Department of Health and Human Services report reveals that refugees and asylees…

1 month ago

USCIS Filing Fees Increase Effective April 1

USCIS filing fees for most petitions and applications are increasing effective April 1, 2024. In…

1 month ago