USCIS No Longer Affording Deference to I-129-based NIV Extensions

For over 10 years, USCIS has taken the approach that, when adjudicating extension petitions involving the same employer, the same beneficiary, and the same underlying facts, its adjudicators would defer to prior approval determinations. USCIS has now reversed this policy, interpreting it as placing an extra burden on the agency to find and compare an old petition to an extension and shifting the burden of proof to USCIS when that burden lies with the petitioner. Moving forward, USCIS officers will be treating all extensions as independent and new filings, even though promulgated regulations do not require supporting documents in many kinds of nonimmigrant extension cases. In its announcement, USCIS also stated that it does not want its adjudicators to rely on previous determinations at all, as it may have the unintended consequences of missing material defects in prior petitions.

Published by
Palmer Polaski PC

Recent Posts

Changes to Naturalization Test

USCIS began using the 2025 Naturalization Civics Test for all applications filed on or after…

2 months ago

USCIS Flexibility Regarding Late-Filed Employment-Based Petitions

The government shutdown that recently ended was the longest in U.S. history. During that time,…

2 months ago

State of Habeas Litigation

The Trump administration drastically changed its interpretation of immigration law as it relates to the…

2 months ago

BIA Ruling Alters Handling of Asylum Cases

Asylum Cooperative Agreements On October 31, 2025, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued Matter…

2 months ago

Understanding the Asylum and Benefits “Pause”

On December 2, 2025, the Trump administration placed an indefinite hold on all asylum applications…

2 months ago

Presidential Proclamation Expands Travel Ban

On December 16, 2025, President Trump significantly expanded the U.S. travel ban, adding many new…

3 months ago